by Ghiringhelli, G., Matsubara, M., Dallera, C., Fracassi, F. and Tagliaferri, A., Brookes, N. B., Kotani, A. and Braicovich, L.
Abstract:
In their Comment to our recent paper [Phys. Rev. B 73, 035111 (2006)], Muller and Hufner proposed a comparison of our Mn L(2),(3) resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) data with low-energy electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) measurements. The differences in the experimental spectra highlighted by the authors can be easily ascribed to the different cross sections in the two techniques, even when they probe the same subset of excited states, namely, the dd excitations. One important difference is that EELS is limited to quartet final states only, whereas RIXS can lead to doublets, too. Thus our theoretical interpretation of the RIXS spectra, made within two different models, is compatible with the traditional crystal-field analysis of EELS. As the Sugano-Tanabe diagram usually do not include the 3d spin-orbit and the interatomic superexchange interactions, their accuracy is limited to hundreds of meV and they should be utilized only for rough assignments of the spectral features. On the contrary, by calculating the RIXS spectral shape we could address more sophisticated models with remarkable agreement to the experimental results. This is hardly possible in the case of low-energy EELS, for which reliable simulations of the spectra are much more difficult.
Reference:
Reply to “Comment on `Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering of MnO: L(2,3) edge measurements and assessment of their interpretation’ ” (Ghiringhelli, G., Matsubara, M., Dallera, C., Fracassi, F. and Tagliaferri, A., Brookes, N. B., Kotani, A. and Braicovich, L.), In PHYSICAL REVIEW B, AMER PHYSICAL SOC, volume 78, 2008.
Bibtex Entry:
@article{ ISI:000259690800120,
Author = {Ghiringhelli, G. and Matsubara, M. and Dallera, C. and Fracassi, F. and
Tagliaferri, A. and Brookes, N. B. and Kotani, A. and Braicovich, L.},
Title = {{Reply to ``Comment on `Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering of MnO:
L(2,3) edge measurements and assessment of their interpretation' ``}},
Journal = {{PHYSICAL REVIEW B}},
Year = {{2008}},
Volume = {{78}},
Number = {{11}},
Month = {{SEP}},
Abstract = {{In their Comment to our recent paper {[}Phys. Rev. B 73, 035111 (2006)],
Muller and Hufner proposed a comparison of our Mn L(2),(3) resonant
inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) data with low-energy electron
energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) measurements. The differences in the
experimental spectra highlighted by the authors can be easily ascribed
to the different cross sections in the two techniques, even when they
probe the same subset of excited states, namely, the dd excitations. One
important difference is that EELS is limited to quartet final states
only, whereas RIXS can lead to doublets, too. Thus our theoretical
interpretation of the RIXS spectra, made within two different models, is
compatible with the traditional crystal-field analysis of EELS. As the
Sugano-Tanabe diagram usually do not include the 3d spin-orbit and the
interatomic superexchange interactions, their accuracy is limited to
hundreds of meV and they should be utilized only for rough assignments
of the spectral features. On the contrary, by calculating the RIXS
spectral shape we could address more sophisticated models with
remarkable agreement to the experimental results. This is hardly
possible in the case of low-energy EELS, for which reliable simulations
of the spectra are much more difficult.}},
Publisher = {{AMER PHYSICAL SOC}},
Address = {{ONE PHYSICS ELLIPSE, COLLEGE PK, MD 20740-3844 USA}},
Type = {{Editorial Material}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Ghiringhelli, G (Corresponding Author), Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Fis, INFM CNR, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
Ghiringhelli, G.; Dallera, C.; Fracassi, F.; Tagliaferri, A.; Braicovich, L., Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Fis, INFM CNR, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
Matsubara, M., Helsinki Univ Technol, Phys Lab, FIN-02015 Helsinki, Finland.
Brookes, N. B., European Synchrotron Radiat Facil, F-38043 Grenoble, France.
Kotani, A., RIKEN SPring 8, Sayo, Hyogo 6795148, Japan.
Kotani, A., Inst Mat Struct Sci, Photon Factory, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050801, Japan.}},
DOI = {{10.1103/PhysRevB.78.117102}},
Article-Number = {{117102}},
ISSN = {{1098-0121}},
Research-Areas = {{Materials Science; Physics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories = {{Materials Science, Multidisciplinary; Physics, Applied; Physics,
Condensed Matter}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Brookes, Nicholas B/C-6718-2019
Tagliaferri, Alberto/L-2903-2015
Ghiringhelli, Giacomo/D-1159-2014
Matsubara, Masahiko/AAQ-3085-2020
}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Brookes, Nicholas B/0000-0002-1342-9530
Tagliaferri, Alberto/0000-0001-8001-1786
Ghiringhelli, Giacomo/0000-0003-0867-7748
Matsubara, Masahiko/0000-0002-3608-6905
Braicovich, Lucio/0000-0001-6548-9140}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{12}},
Times-Cited = {{3}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{20}},
Journal-ISO = {{Phys. Rev. B}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{355EA}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000259690800120}},
DA = {{2020-12-22}},
}
Comments are closed