by Tagliaferri, A, Braicovich, L, van der Laan, G, Ghiringhelli, G, Brookes, NB, Dallera, C, Finazzi, M, Weschke, E, Hu, Z and Kaindl, G
Abstract:
We present experimental and theoretical results on 4p spectroscopy from Gd metal with the aim to clarify in detail the effects of the final state interaction between the 4p and 4d levers which is of paramount importance in 4p spectroscopy of rare earths- and their nearby preceding elements in the Periodic Table. In the nonresonant mode the problem was studied with photoemission (XPS at hv=1140 eV), where XPS denotes x-ray photoemission. In the M-4,M-5 resonant mode the problem was addressed with x-ray scattering with inner shell excitation, leading to final state with a 4p hole [resonant Raman scattering (RRS)I. Nonresonant photoemission spectra are calculated using a full multiplet splitting approach including final state configuration interaction (CI) with the 4d(8)4f(8) configuration which is close in energy to the 4p(5)4f(7) configuration leading to a coherent superposition of the 4p hole with two 4d holes in the final state. The calculated photoemission spectra agree well with the experiment and are used as a guideline to discuss the RRS data. In both cases (XPS and RRS) we point out the characteristic signature of the interaction with the configuration containing two 4d holes. This leads to high energy excitations in the final state, typically 20 eV above the main lines, with a spectral distribution over an energy scale that cannot be explained by ordinary multiplet splitting. On the other hand, we demonstrate that multiplet splitting cannot be neglected with respect to the above mentioned CI. RRS shows clearly that the CI is stronger in the 4p,, than in the 4P(3/2) case in agreement with calculated average energies. When the excitation energy increases above Mg the Raman component becomes broader than with excitation at threshold. This is interpreted as evidence for the increasing importance of excitations with lower spin. Besides the dispersive (Raman) component the RRS spectra show a strong nondispersive peak at constant scattered-photon energy. This behavior is briefly discussed in connection with the dynamics of the excited state. [S0163-1829(99)11931-3].
Reference:
Many-body effects in nonresonant and resonant 4p spectroscopy of Gd metal (Tagliaferri, A, Braicovich, L, van der Laan, G, Ghiringhelli, G, Brookes, NB, Dallera, C, Finazzi, M, Weschke, E, Hu, Z and Kaindl, G), In PHYSICAL REVIEW B, AMER PHYSICAL SOC, volume 60, 1999.
Bibtex Entry:
@article{ ISI:000082478600086,
Author = {Tagliaferri, A and Braicovich, L and van der Laan, G and Ghiringhelli, G
and Brookes, NB and Dallera, C and Finazzi, M and Weschke, E and Hu, Z
and Kaindl, G},
Title = {{Many-body effects in nonresonant and resonant 4p spectroscopy of Gd
metal}},
Journal = {{PHYSICAL REVIEW B}},
Year = {{1999}},
Volume = {{60}},
Number = {{8}},
Pages = {{5728-5736}},
Month = {{AUG 15}},
Abstract = {{We present experimental and theoretical results on 4p spectroscopy from
Gd metal with the aim to clarify in detail the effects of the final
state interaction between the 4p and 4d levers which is of paramount
importance in 4p spectroscopy of rare earths- and their nearby preceding
elements in the Periodic Table. In the nonresonant mode the problem was
studied with photoemission (XPS at hv=1140 eV), where XPS denotes x-ray
photoemission. In the M-4,M-5 resonant mode the problem was addressed
with x-ray scattering with inner shell excitation, leading to final
state with a 4p hole {[}resonant Raman scattering (RRS)I. Nonresonant
photoemission spectra are calculated using a full multiplet splitting
approach including final state configuration interaction (CI) with the
4d(8)4f(8) configuration which is close in energy to the 4p(5)4f(7)
configuration leading to a coherent superposition of the 4p hole with
two 4d holes in the final state. The calculated photoemission spectra
agree well with the experiment and are used as a guideline to discuss
the RRS data. In both cases (XPS and RRS) we point out the
characteristic signature of the interaction with the configuration
containing two 4d holes. This leads to high energy excitations in the
final state, typically 20 eV above the main lines, with a spectral
distribution over an energy scale that cannot be explained by ordinary
multiplet splitting. On the other hand, we demonstrate that multiplet
splitting cannot be neglected with respect to the above mentioned CI.
RRS shows clearly that the CI is stronger in the 4p,, than in the
4P(3/2) case in agreement with calculated average energies. When the
excitation energy increases above Mg the Raman component becomes broader
than with excitation at threshold. This is interpreted as evidence for
the increasing importance of excitations with lower spin. Besides the
dispersive (Raman) component the RRS spectra show a strong nondispersive
peak at constant scattered-photon energy. This behavior is briefly
discussed in connection with the dynamics of the excited state.
{[}S0163-1829(99)11931-3].}},
Publisher = {{AMER PHYSICAL SOC}},
Address = {{ONE PHYSICS ELLIPSE, COLLEGE PK, MD 20740-3844 USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Tagliaferri, A (Corresponding Author), Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Fis, INFM, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Fis, INFM, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
SERC, Daresbury Lab, Warrington WA4 4AD, Cheshire, England.
European Synchrotron Radiat Facil, F-38043 Grenoble, France.
INFM, TASC, Elettra Synchrotron Light Source, I-34012 Trieste, Italy.
Free Univ Berlin, Inst Expt Phys, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.}},
DOI = {{10.1103/PhysRevB.60.5728}},
ISSN = {{1098-0121}},
EISSN = {{1550-235X}},
Keywords-Plus = {{RAY-EMISSION-SPECTROSCOPY; MAGNETIC CIRCULAR-DICHROISM;
INELASTIC-SCATTERING; RAMAN-SCATTERING; SYNCHROTRON-RADIATION;
PHOTOELECTRON-SPECTRA; ELECTRON INTERACTIONS; MULTIPLET STRUCTURE;
HELICAL UNDULATOR; CORE LEVELS}},
Research-Areas = {{Materials Science; Physics}},
Web-of-Science-Categories = {{Materials Science, Multidisciplinary; Physics, Applied; Physics,
Condensed Matter}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Ghiringhelli, Giacomo/D-1159-2014
Brookes, Nicholas B/C-6718-2019
Tagliaferri, Alberto/L-2903-2015
Hu, Zhiwei/B-8635-2008
Finazzi, Marco/M-7401-2015
van der Laan, Gerrit/Q-1662-2015
Weschke, Eugen/J-4404-2013
}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Ghiringhelli, Giacomo/0000-0003-0867-7748
Brookes, Nicholas B/0000-0002-1342-9530
Tagliaferri, Alberto/0000-0001-8001-1786
Finazzi, Marco/0000-0002-9197-3654
van der Laan, Gerrit/0000-0001-6852-2495
Weschke, Eugen/0000-0002-2141-0944
Braicovich, Lucio/0000-0001-6548-9140}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{34}},
Times-Cited = {{10}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{3}},
Journal-ISO = {{Phys. Rev. B}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{234HL}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000082478600086}},
DA = {{2020-12-22}},
}
Comments are closed